1
0
mirror of https://github.com/oliverbooth/X10D synced 2024-11-22 19:28:48 +00:00
Oliver Booth 2022-05-14 20:04:06 +01:00
parent 0c169cdaf4
commit eb31e0fe3f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 32A00B35503AF634
4 changed files with 149 additions and 69 deletions

63
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml vendored Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
name: Bug Report
description: File a bug report
title: "[Bug]: "
labels: ["bug"]
assignees:
- oliverbooth
body:
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: |
Thanks for taking the time to fill out this bug report!
- type: textarea
id: expected-behavior
attributes:
label: Expected Behavior
description: What did you expect to happen?
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: actual-behavior
attributes:
label: Actual Behavior
description: What actually happened?
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: snippet
attributes:
label: MCVE
description: Provide a [minimal, reproducible example](https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example) of the code that causes the behaviour.
render: csharp
validations:
required: false
- type: dropdown
id: version
attributes:
label: Version
description: What version of the package are you running?
options:
- 3.1.0
- 3.0.0
- 2.6.0
- 2.5.0
- 2.4.0
- 2.3.0
- 2.2.0
- 2.1.0
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: logs
attributes:
label: Relevant log output
description: Please copy and paste any relevant log output. This will be automatically formatted into code, so no need for backticks.
render: shell
- type: checkboxes
id: terms
attributes:
label: Code of Conduct
description: By submitting this issue, you agree to follow our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/oliverbooth/X10D/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
options:
- label: I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
required: true

View File

@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
---
name: Bug report
about: Create a report to help us improve
title: ''
labels: bug
assignees: oliverbooth
---
**Describe the bug**
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
**To Reproduce**
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error
**Expected behavior**
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
**Additional context**
Add any other context about the problem here.

View File

@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
---
name: Extension method request
about: Make a request for an extension method you believe should be implemented
title: ''
labels: enhancement
assignees: oliverbooth
---
**Type**
Provide the fully-qualified type name of the extension method you wish to have here. Example:
```cs
System.String
```
**Extension method signature**
Provide the full method signature here, without parameter names, but do not include the leading `this T x` parameter. Example:
```cs
string Random(int, System.Random)
```
**Parameters**
Document each of the parameters here, with their name and description - i.e. this would be equivalent to the entry in the XMLDoc. Use a table layout like in the following example:
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|- |- |- |
|length|`int`|The length of the string to generate.|
|random|`System.Random`|The instance of `System.Random` to use for the operation|
**Description**
Briefly but concisely document the method's purpose here. i.e. This would be the `<summary>` entry in the XMLDoc.
**Benefits**
Give a reason as to why this method should be added. Does it add a need not satisified by any other X10D method? Does .NET not offer similar operations? Why should this method exist?
**Drawbacks**
Give a reason as to why this method should *not* be added. Is it an expensive operation? Does it defy .NET guidelines? If you cannot think of any, leave this blank.
**(Optional) Implementation example**
If you prefer, you can give an example of how this method might be implemented using a C# codeblock.
Do not include the method signature here - just the body.
```cs
{
// code
}
```

View File

@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
name: Extension Method Request
description: Make a request for an extension method you believe should be implemented
title: "[Request]: "
labels: ["enhancement"]
assignees:
- oliverbooth
body:
- type: markdown
attributes:
value: |
Thanks for taking the time to suggest an extension method!
- type: textarea
id: fqn
attributes:
label: Type to extend
description: Provide the fully qualified type name of the extension method you're suggesting.
render: csharp
placeholder: "System.Drawing.Color"
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: signature
attributes:
label: Signature
description: Provide the method signature here. __**DO NOT**__ include `public static` or the leading `this` parameter - these are inherent to extension methods. __**DO**__ include the return type and parameter names.
placeholder: "Color WithR(int r)"
render: csharp
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: summary
attributes:
label: Summary
description: Briefly but concisely document the method's purpose. i.e. This would be the `<summary`> entry in the XMLDoc.
placeholder: "Returns a new Color whose A, B and G components are the same as the specified color, and whose R component is a new value."
render: md
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: parameters
attributes:
label: Parameters
description: "If this method accepts parameters, document each of the parameters here, with their name and description - i.e. this would be equivalent to the `<param>` entry in the XMLDoc. __**DO NOT**__ include the leading `this` parameter. Use a table layout like in the provided example."
value:
|
| Parameter | Type | Description |
| - | - | - |
|r | `float` | The new value for the R component. |
render: md
validations:
required: false
- type: textarea
id: benefits
attributes:
label: Benefits
description: Give a reason as to why this method should be added. Does it add a need not satisfied by any other X10D method? Does .NET not offer similar functionality?
placeholder: "'with' expressions are not supported for Color, as the setters of R G and B are get-only."
validations:
required: true
- type: textarea
id: drawbacks
attributes:
label: Drawbacks
description: Give a reason as to why this method should *not* be added. Is it an expensive operation? Does it defy .NET guidelines? If you cannot think of any drawbacks, you may leave this blank.
validations:
required: false
- type: textarea
id: implementation-example
attributes:
label: Implementation Example
description: If you prefer, you can give an example of how this method might be implemented. __**DO NOT**__ include the signature here, only the body.
placeholder:
|
return Color.FromArgb(value.A, r, value.G, value.B);
render: csharp
validations:
required: false
- type: checkboxes
id: terms
attributes:
label: Code of Conduct
description: By submitting this issue, you agree to follow our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/oliverbooth/X10D/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
options:
- label: I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
required: true