mirror of
https://github.com/oliverbooth/X10D
synced 2024-11-23 00:18:47 +00:00
[ci skip] Migrate issue template to issue forms
https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/configuring-issue-templates-for-your-repository#creating-issue-forms
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c169cdaf4
commit
eb31e0fe3f
63
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml
vendored
Normal file
63
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml
vendored
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
|||||||
|
name: Bug Report
|
||||||
|
description: File a bug report
|
||||||
|
title: "[Bug]: "
|
||||||
|
labels: ["bug"]
|
||||||
|
assignees:
|
||||||
|
- oliverbooth
|
||||||
|
body:
|
||||||
|
- type: markdown
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
value: |
|
||||||
|
Thanks for taking the time to fill out this bug report!
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: expected-behavior
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Expected Behavior
|
||||||
|
description: What did you expect to happen?
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: actual-behavior
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Actual Behavior
|
||||||
|
description: What actually happened?
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: snippet
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: MCVE
|
||||||
|
description: Provide a [minimal, reproducible example](https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example) of the code that causes the behaviour.
|
||||||
|
render: csharp
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: false
|
||||||
|
- type: dropdown
|
||||||
|
id: version
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Version
|
||||||
|
description: What version of the package are you running?
|
||||||
|
options:
|
||||||
|
- 3.1.0
|
||||||
|
- 3.0.0
|
||||||
|
- 2.6.0
|
||||||
|
- 2.5.0
|
||||||
|
- 2.4.0
|
||||||
|
- 2.3.0
|
||||||
|
- 2.2.0
|
||||||
|
- 2.1.0
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: logs
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Relevant log output
|
||||||
|
description: Please copy and paste any relevant log output. This will be automatically formatted into code, so no need for backticks.
|
||||||
|
render: shell
|
||||||
|
- type: checkboxes
|
||||||
|
id: terms
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Code of Conduct
|
||||||
|
description: By submitting this issue, you agree to follow our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/oliverbooth/X10D/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
|
||||||
|
options:
|
||||||
|
- label: I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
24
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
vendored
24
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
vendored
@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
---
|
|
||||||
name: Bug report
|
|
||||||
about: Create a report to help us improve
|
|
||||||
title: ''
|
|
||||||
labels: bug
|
|
||||||
assignees: oliverbooth
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Describe the bug**
|
|
||||||
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**To Reproduce**
|
|
||||||
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
|
|
||||||
1. Go to '...'
|
|
||||||
2. Click on '....'
|
|
||||||
3. Scroll down to '....'
|
|
||||||
4. See error
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Expected behavior**
|
|
||||||
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Additional context**
|
|
||||||
Add any other context about the problem here.
|
|
||||||
@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
---
|
|
||||||
name: Extension method request
|
|
||||||
about: Make a request for an extension method you believe should be implemented
|
|
||||||
title: ''
|
|
||||||
labels: enhancement
|
|
||||||
assignees: oliverbooth
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Type**
|
|
||||||
Provide the fully-qualified type name of the extension method you wish to have here. Example:
|
|
||||||
```cs
|
|
||||||
System.String
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Extension method signature**
|
|
||||||
Provide the full method signature here, without parameter names, but do not include the leading `this T x` parameter. Example:
|
|
||||||
```cs
|
|
||||||
string Random(int, System.Random)
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Parameters**
|
|
||||||
Document each of the parameters here, with their name and description - i.e. this would be equivalent to the entry in the XMLDoc. Use a table layout like in the following example:
|
|
||||||
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|
|
||||||
|- |- |- |
|
|
||||||
|length|`int`|The length of the string to generate.|
|
|
||||||
|random|`System.Random`|The instance of `System.Random` to use for the operation|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Description**
|
|
||||||
Briefly but concisely document the method's purpose here. i.e. This would be the `<summary>` entry in the XMLDoc.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Benefits**
|
|
||||||
Give a reason as to why this method should be added. Does it add a need not satisified by any other X10D method? Does .NET not offer similar operations? Why should this method exist?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Drawbacks**
|
|
||||||
Give a reason as to why this method should *not* be added. Is it an expensive operation? Does it defy .NET guidelines? If you cannot think of any, leave this blank.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**(Optional) Implementation example**
|
|
||||||
If you prefer, you can give an example of how this method might be implemented using a C# codeblock.
|
|
||||||
Do not include the method signature here - just the body.
|
|
||||||
```cs
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
// code
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
86
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/extension-method-request.yml
vendored
Normal file
86
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/extension-method-request.yml
vendored
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
|||||||
|
name: Extension Method Request
|
||||||
|
description: Make a request for an extension method you believe should be implemented
|
||||||
|
title: "[Request]: "
|
||||||
|
labels: ["enhancement"]
|
||||||
|
assignees:
|
||||||
|
- oliverbooth
|
||||||
|
body:
|
||||||
|
- type: markdown
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
value: |
|
||||||
|
Thanks for taking the time to suggest an extension method!
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: fqn
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Type to extend
|
||||||
|
description: Provide the fully qualified type name of the extension method you're suggesting.
|
||||||
|
render: csharp
|
||||||
|
placeholder: "System.Drawing.Color"
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: signature
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Signature
|
||||||
|
description: Provide the method signature here. __**DO NOT**__ include `public static` or the leading `this` parameter - these are inherent to extension methods. __**DO**__ include the return type and parameter names.
|
||||||
|
placeholder: "Color WithR(int r)"
|
||||||
|
render: csharp
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: summary
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Summary
|
||||||
|
description: Briefly but concisely document the method's purpose. i.e. This would be the `<summary`> entry in the XMLDoc.
|
||||||
|
placeholder: "Returns a new Color whose A, B and G components are the same as the specified color, and whose R component is a new value."
|
||||||
|
render: md
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: parameters
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Parameters
|
||||||
|
description: "If this method accepts parameters, document each of the parameters here, with their name and description - i.e. this would be equivalent to the `<param>` entry in the XMLDoc. __**DO NOT**__ include the leading `this` parameter. Use a table layout like in the provided example."
|
||||||
|
value:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
| Parameter | Type | Description |
|
||||||
|
| - | - | - |
|
||||||
|
|r | `float` | The new value for the R component. |
|
||||||
|
render: md
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: false
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: benefits
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Benefits
|
||||||
|
description: Give a reason as to why this method should be added. Does it add a need not satisfied by any other X10D method? Does .NET not offer similar functionality?
|
||||||
|
placeholder: "'with' expressions are not supported for Color, as the setters of R G and B are get-only."
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: drawbacks
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Drawbacks
|
||||||
|
description: Give a reason as to why this method should *not* be added. Is it an expensive operation? Does it defy .NET guidelines? If you cannot think of any drawbacks, you may leave this blank.
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: false
|
||||||
|
- type: textarea
|
||||||
|
id: implementation-example
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Implementation Example
|
||||||
|
description: If you prefer, you can give an example of how this method might be implemented. __**DO NOT**__ include the signature here, only the body.
|
||||||
|
placeholder:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
return Color.FromArgb(value.A, r, value.G, value.B);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
render: csharp
|
||||||
|
validations:
|
||||||
|
required: false
|
||||||
|
- type: checkboxes
|
||||||
|
id: terms
|
||||||
|
attributes:
|
||||||
|
label: Code of Conduct
|
||||||
|
description: By submitting this issue, you agree to follow our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/oliverbooth/X10D/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
|
||||||
|
options:
|
||||||
|
- label: I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
|
||||||
|
required: true
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user