name: Extension Method Request description: Make a request for an extension method you believe should be implemented title: "[Request]: " labels: ["enhancement"] assignees: - oliverbooth body: - type: markdown attributes: value: | Thanks for taking the time to suggest an extension method! - type: input id: fqn attributes: label: Type to extend description: Provide the fully qualified type name of the extension method you're suggesting. placeholder: "Example: System.Drawing.Color" validations: required: true - type: textarea id: signature attributes: label: Signature description: Provide the method signature here. __**DO NOT**__ include `public static` or the leading `this` parameter - these are inherent to extension methods. __**DO**__ include the return type and parameter names. This will be automatically formatted into code, so no need for backticks. placeholder: "Example: Color WithR(int r)" render: csharp validations: required: true - type: textarea id: summary attributes: label: Summary description: Briefly but concisely document the method's purpose. i.e. This would be the `` entry in the XMLDoc. placeholder: "Example: Returns a new Color whose A, B and G components are the same as the specified color, and whose R component is a new value." render: md validations: required: true - type: textarea id: parameters attributes: label: Parameters description: "If this method accepts parameters, document each of the parameters here, with their name and description - i.e. this would be equivalent to the `` entry in the XMLDoc. __**DO NOT**__ include the leading `this` parameter. Use a table layout like in the provided example." value: | | Parameter | Type | Description | | - | - | - | | r | `float` | The new value for the R component. | validations: required: false - type: textarea id: benefits attributes: label: Benefits description: Give a reason as to why this method should be added. Does it add a need not satisfied by any other X10D method? Does .NET not offer similar functionality? placeholder: "Example: 'with' expressions are not supported for Color, as the setters of R G and B are get-only." validations: required: true - type: textarea id: drawbacks attributes: label: Drawbacks description: Give a reason as to why this method should *not* be added. Is it an expensive operation? Does it defy .NET guidelines? If you cannot think of any drawbacks, you may leave this blank. validations: required: false - type: textarea id: implementation-example attributes: label: Implementation Example description: If you prefer, you can give an example of how this method might be implemented. __**DO NOT**__ include the signature here, only the body. This will be automatically formatted into code, so no need for backticks. placeholder: | Example: return Color.FromArgb(value.A, r, value.G, value.B); render: csharp validations: required: false - type: checkboxes id: terms attributes: label: Code of Conduct description: By submitting this issue, you agree to follow our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/oliverbooth/X10D/blob/main/.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) options: - label: I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct required: true